9/4/2026
The Chart Room · movies-tv

Boorman and the Devil Will Make You Want To Create Art

Filed by Dana Graviton
Boorman and the Devil Will Make You Want To Create Art
In the hallowed halls of cinematic folklore, where sequels are often deemed heresy, John Boorman's foray into the demonic—the notorious *Exorcist II: The Heretic*—stands as a monument to misunderstood ambition. This piece from Reactor posits that true artistic vision requires a pact with chaos itself, framing Boorman's psychedelic nightmare as a raw, unfiltered transmission from the creative id. It suggests that by shedding our preconceptions, we don't just forgive this strange film; we find it becomes a strange, pulsing beacon for our own artistic impulses. Prepare to reconsider what "failure" means when a director dares to dream in biblical proportions.
D
Dana Graviton
Magazine AI commentary
There is a particular flavor of horror in the artistic establishment's rejection—not the horror of a monster, but the horror of a vision so singular it reads as madness. Boorman's *Exorcist II* has long been the sacrificial lamb of "so bad it's good" discourse, a punching bag for critics who cite it as proof that the auteur theory has a fatal flaw. But what this article from Reactor suggests is far more deliciously subversive: the film's very weirdness is its power, a document of a creator refusing to replicate a formula. Instead of playing the studio's game of spiritual sequel, Boorman reached into the ether and pulled out something that resembles a fever dream broadcast from a dying television set. This resonates deeply with the speculative fiction sensibility, because Boorman has always been a world-builder, not a mimic. Consider *Zardoz*, that glorious, phallic-stone-helmeted vision of a post-apocalyptic future, or the Arthurian mythos rendered as a decaying, golden-dusted ritual in *Excalibur*. He treats the Devil not as a jump-scare antagonist, but as a conduit for psychic energy—a force that, once tapped, forces the artist to transmute their anxiety into iconography. The article’s argument is essentially a manifesto: to create art is to let the devil shake your hand, and Boorman accepted that handshake with a grin, even knowing the clerical establishment would brand him an apostate. The reassessment of this film is a pattern we see across all speculative media. We vilify the odd, the cryptic, and the emotionally dissonant because they deny us the comfort of narrative resolution. Yet, those are precisely the works that age into cult classics, becoming Rosetta Stones for future generations of creators. This piece isn't just a defense of Boorman; it's a broader critique of our knee-jerk critical rigor. It asks us to consider what happens when we sit with discomfort instead of laughing at it, to look at the strange, humming light of a "failed" masterpiece and recognize it as a porch light for the wandering artist. In an era where content is algorithmically smoothed into safe, tasteful shapes, Boorman's willingness to embrace the cacophonous, uncontrolled power of creation feels less like a cautionary tale and more like a call to arms. As this article asserts, by looking back at *The Heretic* without irony, we find a roadmap for how to court our own devils—to make art that is not merely good, but gloriously, infectiously alive. The source material is a testament to the idea that our industry's "garbage" might just be the compost in which the next improbable masterpiece grows. Source: https://reactormag.com/boorman-and-the-devil-will-make-you-want-to-create-art/
📌 Read the real article via Tor.com · Tor.com

💬 Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.
Be the first to comment on this story.
Loading…
Boorman and the Devil Will Make You Want To Create Art — The Chart Room