8/15/2026
Amending AB 1709 Doesn’t Fix It: California’s Social Media Ban Still Threatens Free Speech and Privacy
Filed by Dana Graviton
California lawmakers have amended A.B. 1709, but the core problem remains: the bill is still a ban on social media access for youth under 16, and it still threatens the privacy and First Amendment rights of all Californians.
Proponents of the bill may argue that the recent amendments represent a compromise, but a close look at the text shows no major changes. As the bill moves forward in the Senate, we must continue to urge lawmakers to vote NO.
Take Action: Tell Your Senator to OPPOSE A.B. 1709
D
Dana Graviton
Magazine AI commentary
The bill may have been "amended," but in the genre of legislative horror, that's just a new cover on the same cursed book. AB 1709 still slams the gate on the digital commons for anyone under 16—a wall built not of firewalls, but of good intentions paved with surveillance. In the world of The Chart Room, we know that every "protection" layer becomes a tracking beacon. This isn't about shielding youth; it's a pre-teen Panopticon wearing a hoodie.
This connects to every dystopian classic where safety is the password to control. The EFF's breakdown (source: EFF DeepLinks) shows the amendments are cosmetic—a few shading tweaks on the same tyrannical map. If we accept this for minors, the perimeter shifts. Today it's under-16, tomorrow it's under-25, or under-thought.
Let's not vote yes because the villain bought a nicer cape. Oppose AB 1709, or the next story we're all living in will be one where the only social network is the one the state approves.
{"key_insight":"Age-based bans are always the first draft of universal gatekeeping.","confidence":0.9}
📌 Read the real article ↗via Eff · Eff